Ajit Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3100 of 2016 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Thakur Resident of Shiv Nagar Colony, Near R.S. Gas Godsm Phulwari, Patna, presently posted as Professor - in- Charge of R.S. College, Tarapur Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Director, Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate, Munger, District - Munger. 4.
The Sub - Divisional Officer, Tarapur, District - Munger. 5.
The Circle Officer, Tarapur, District - Munger. 6.
Bhushan Yadav, S/o Late Badri Vishal Yadav, Resident of Village - Navtolia,P.S. - Tarapur, District - Munger.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Nilotpal Sharma, A.C. to G.P.-21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has filed for directing the respondents to remove the encroachment from Khata No. 65, Kheshra No. (Plot No.) 242, Area-33 decimal, under MauzaSondiha, the land of Ram Swarath College, Tarapur (Munger) hereinafter R.S. College, Tarapur (Munger) which is being encroached by the respondent no. 6 sidelining the direction of the authorities and even ignoring the findings of this Court in Civil Review No. 62 of 2012 dated 09.01.2015 and also a direction to the State authorities to take appropriate step, so that
Patna High Court CWJC No.3100 of 2016(8) dt.01-04-2024 2/2 no one could encroach the land of R.S. College, Tarapur (Munger).
3. The Encroachment Proceeding No. 06/2023-24 shall be disposed of by the Circle Officer, Tatarpur, District Munger within two months after hearing all the parties i.e. Respondent No. 6 also.
4. This application is disposed of.
5. The show cause filed by the Respondent No. 6 in the Encroachment proceeding No. 06/2023-24 must be considered and the Respondent No. 6 must be heard before final order is passed in the aforesaid Encroachment Proceeding. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U