← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30031/2019allowed

Ram Murti Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-17Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30031 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2018 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

RAM MURTI CHAUDHARY Son of Late Ram Kripal Chaoudhary, Resident of Village- Bhadaiya, Mohiuddinnagar, P.S.- Mohiuddinnagar, DistrictSamastipur. 2.

Sheela Choudhary, Wife of Ram Murti Chaudhary, Resident of VillageBhadaiya, Mohiuddinnagar, P.S.- Mohiuddinnagar, District- Samastipur. 3.

Rajeev Ranjan Chaudhary @ Bobby Son of late Ram Kirpal Choudhary Resident of Village- Bhadaiya, Mohiuddinnagar, P.S.- Mohiuddinnagar, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Seema Kumari Daughter of late Devendra Rai, Resident of Mohallakasipur, Ward No. 6, Under P.S. Town, Samastipur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 160 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30031 of 2019(3) dt.17-05-2019 2/2 petitioners happen to be father-in-law, mother-in-law and younger brother-in-law of the complainant. The have no concern with the marital affairs of the complainant and her husband because they live separately. Hence, the petitioners may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner in the event of surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Complainant Case No. 160 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T