Virendra Ram @ Birendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30667 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2026 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Virendra Ram @ Birendra Ram S/o Late Raji Ram R/o Village - Sabdala, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. - Rohtas.

2.

Pritam Kumar S/o Virendra Ram @ Birendra Ram R/o Village - Sabdala, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kr. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 16 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons/family members alleged to assault informant causing head and bodily injuries. It is alleged that assault was made by using sword, farsa and hand knuckles.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that informant alleged that he was assaulted by four persons having equipped with sharp edged weapons, but none of the injury as found upon injured appears caused by sharp edged weapon, rather nature of injury was lacerated. It is also submitted that three small injuries were found upon "parietal part of the head", which upon medical examination

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30667 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 found simple in nature and furthermore same also not appears convincing, in view of specific allegation that assault was caused by four persons. It is submitted that informant and petitioners are agnates and due to family disputes and differences present false allegation was raised. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that petitioners are men of clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as nature of injury, which alleged to be caused by petitioners upon informant found simple in nature, accordingly all above-named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Bikramganj, Rohtas/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 16 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Tripathi/- U T