Abhimanu Kumar @ Mannu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29898 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Abhimanu Kumar @ Mannu S/O Arjun Rai @ Arjun Ray R/O MohallaDaudpur, Ward No. 1, Police Station-Maner, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 485 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 14.12.2025 at about 11.00 P.M., the petitioner and co-accused Bunty Kumar were hurling abuses in an inebriated condition. When the father of the informant objected to their conduct, the petitioner allegedly inflicted blows on his abdomen using a sharp-cutting weapon. It has further been alleged that when Tinku came to rescue the informant's father, the petitioner assaulted him on his hand with a knife.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29898 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that admittedly as per the prosecution case, the petitioner was not in a fit state of mind as he was in an inebriated condition. Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the injury report called for by the order dated 07.05.2026, submits that although the father of the informant had sustained one penetrating wound on the epigastrium which was opined to be simple in nature and caused by a sharp edged weapon, the exploratory laparotomy subsequently performed upon him indicates that the injury was, in fact, grievous in nature. It has further been submitted that the other injured person, Mannu, sustained simple injuries.
It has also been submitted that the parties are next-door neighbours. Charge sheet has been filed and there is no allegation of tampering with the evidence against the petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail and he is in custody since 16.12.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29898 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026 3/3
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna, in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 485 of 2025.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) Jyoti/- U T