Md. Tamanne v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48787 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -335 Year- 2017 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Md. Tamanne son of Md. Azhar @ Md. Mazhar resident of village - Dharampur Narayan P.S.Minapur, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 335/2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 354, 380, 379, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant by rod.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is delay in lodging F.I.R. for more than a month and delay has not properly been explained. Further there is case and counter case between the parties.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48787 of 2018 (2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 335/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T