← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30141/2025allowed

Pappu Kumar @ Sunny v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30141 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-511 Year-2024 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== PAPPU KUMAR @ SUNNY, S/o Eshwar Ray, R/o vill - Baudhi Kala, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt.- Nawada, At present Ramkrishna Colony, P.S. - Bahadurpur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Mr. Jay Ram Prasad learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 511 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the police personnel was on vehicle checking duty, the petitioner tried to flee away with his bike. He was apprehended and he could not produce the documents of the bike. It is further alleged that he disclosed that he has stolen this bike today itself from Gandhi Maidan P.S.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30141 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He has been framed in this case only on the basis of his criminal antecedents and as he could not show the documents of the bike. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that there is no compliant of the alleged theft. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.12.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of seven cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Patna City in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 511 of 2024 with a condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of the offence in future. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T