← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14632/2012dismissed

Amar Nath Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-02-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14632 of 2012 ====================================================== Amar Nath Jha S/O Late Nitya Nand Jha Resident Of Village Rampur, P.S. Murliganj, District Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Chief Engineer Mechanical, Department Of Public Health Engineering, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Saharsa Circle, Saharsa.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for direction to the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner under the department as the petitioner has engaged on daily wager.

3. Learned counsel for the State has filed a detailed counter affidavit stating therein that the petitioner was engaged as a daily wager employee with effect from 27.01.1988. Thereafter, the respondent no.3 has issued a letter vide memo no.5777 dated 04.04.1988 by which he had cancelled the letter dated 04.01.1988 by which the petitioner has been engaged as

Patna High Court CWJC No.14632 of 2012(3) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 daily wager employee and in view of the aforesaid it appears that the petitioner had worked only with effect from 27.01.1988 till 07.04.1988 i.e. 72 days only and the petitioner was neither appointed in regular established nor against the sanctioned post so his case cannot be considered in the light of State Government Circular.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions there is no merit in the writ petition, accordingly, dismissed. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U