Ramjee Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32044 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2022 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Ramjee Prasad Son Of Dhanpat Prasad Resident Of Village- Nayaka Tola, Police Station- Harsidhi, District-East Champaran 2.

Signi Devi Wife Of Ramjee Prasad Resident Of Village- Nayaka Tola, Police Station- Harsidhi, District-East Champaran 3.

Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Kumar Son Of Ramjee Prasad Resident Of VillageNayaka Tola, Police Station- Harsidhi, District-East Champaran 4.

Pawan Kumar Son Of Ramjee Prasad Resident Of Village- Nayaka Tola, Police Station- Harsidhi, District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 have been apprehended by the police, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this application with regard to petitioner nos. 1 and 3.

2. Permission is granted.

3. Accordingly, this application with regard to petitioner nos. 1 and 3 have been dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State for consideration of bail with regard to rest of the petitioners.

5. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32044 of 2023(2) dt.20-07-2023 2/3 case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. He submits that the petitioners are the in-laws of the deceased. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

8. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 4 in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32044 of 2023(2) dt.20-07-2023 3/3 pending/successor court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 543 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T