Jalil Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30002 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Jalil Mansoori Son of Indris Mansoori Resident of Village - Bagahi, P.S.- Itarhi, District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 349 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, four miscreants looted away Rs. 13,000/- (thirteen thousand), mobile phone etc. on the gun point from the informant.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has during course of investigation on the confessional statement of co-accused Maksood Mansoori. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No TIP has been held, though, petitioner is in custody since 21-04-2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30002 of 2020(3) dt.01-12-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application of petitioner is allowed. Let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Buxar in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 349 of 2019, on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.".

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay/- U T