Ram Vinay Kumar @ Ram Vinay Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29746 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2022 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RAM VINAY KUMAR @ RAM VINAY SHARMA SON OF RAMAVTAR SHARMA R/O VILLAGE- BANDHUGANJ, P.S.- GHOSI, DISTRICTJEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual mode. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No.01/2022, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

Allegedly 4 litres of Mahua liquor is said to have been recovered from the possession of one apprehended accused Kuleshari Devi from the Guava orchard of the petitioner and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29746 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 approximately 200 litres of Jawa Mahua has been destroyed. Apprehended accused disclosed the involvement of petitioner in the liquor business.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of their enemies. His name has transpired in this case on the confessional statement of the apprehended coaccused. He has not been apprehended on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession. He has no concern either with the recovery of the illicit liquor or any trade of liquor. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner is a member of the syndicate involved in liquor business, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T