Mukesh Kumar Ray @ Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32484 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2021 Thana- VIDYAPATINAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Ray @ Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh Rai S/O Ram Lakhan Ray Resident of Village- Simri, P.S-Vidhyapati Nagar, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate Mrs.Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 The present petition is by way of fourth attempt at the behest of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code inasmuch as all the earlier petitions filed by the petitioner have stood rejected. 2.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons, armed with iron rod, lathi and sticks having arrived at the house of the informant and upon being ordered by the co-accused person, namely, Ram Lakhan Rai, the petitioner had assaulted the father of the informant with iron rod causing injuries on his head, whereafter, the other co-accused persons had also brutally assaulted the father of the informant. The accused persons are also alleged to have assaulted the cousin brother of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32484 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/3 informant and his uncle when they had gone to save the father of the informant.

3.

The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 5.10.2021, hence, a sympathetic view be taken and he be granted the privilege of regular bail.

4.

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted, by referring to the earlier order of this Court dated 11.1.2023 that this Court has observed therein that a bare perusal of the case diary would show that there are ample materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and the petitioner is the main assailant who has inflicted fatal injuries upon the father of the informant, leading to his death, which has also stood corroborated from the postmortem report.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the materials on record, this Court finds that there are ample materials on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and moreover, he is the main assailant, who had assaulted the father of the informant with iron rod causing grievous injuries on his head

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32484 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 3/3 resulting in his subsequent death, apart from the fact that there is no change in circumstance so as to warrant reconsideration of the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail, hence, I do not find any merit in the present petition, thus, the same stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T