Patna High CourtCR. REV./346/2023dismissed

Aditya Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.346 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== ADITYA KUMAR Son of Shree Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh Resident of village - Samsahara, P.S. - Belaganj, Distt. - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner in the present case is seeking setting aside of the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by learned court of Special Judge (Children Court), Gaya in Juvenile Trial No.13/2020 arising out of Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 63/2020 registered for the offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code whereby and whereunder the application seeking regular bail has been rejected. He has got antecedent of two cases and is in custody since 03.05.2020.

3. It appears that on earlier occasion, the petitioner had moved this Court in Cr. Rev. No. 471 of 2021 against the same impugned order dated 22.11.2022. This Court vide its order dated 19.07.2022 refused to interfere with the said order.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.346 of 2023(3) dt.13-10-2023 2/2 No liberty was reserved to the petitioner to move this Court afresh on the same order.

4. Under the circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the present revision application afresh for setting aside of the same impugned order, which has already been upheld by this Court, cannot be entertained. Had the liberty been reserved to the petitioner, the matter would have been otherwise.

5. This revision application is thus dismissed but with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy before appropriate court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rishi/- U T