← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32911/2024bail granted

Sonu Chaurasiya @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-07Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32911 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SONU CHAURASIYA @ SONU KUMAR S/O SHIV KUMAR BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE - SARMASTPUR, P.S - SAKRA, DISTT. - MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of five cases.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 895.68 litres of liquor from a cremation Ghat at Sarmastpur.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which is accessible to public at large and does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32911 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/3 implicated at the instance of the Chawkidar with whom petitioner is on an inimical term. It is further submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that if the Chawkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why the Chawkidar did not inform the police prior to the institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32911 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 3/3 antecedent of more than five cases in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T