Hira Lal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16015 of 2013 ====================================================== Hira Lal Prasad Son of Late Bodh Narayan Mahto Resident of VillageTelhara, Police Station- Ekangarsarai, District- Nalanda, At Present Posted As Chairman, Irrigation Division, Araria, And Presently Residing At Koshi Colony, Quarter No. F/7, Ward No. 16, Araria, Police Station and DistrictAraria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director, Revenue Administration, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Purnea 5.
The District Magistrate, Araria 6.
The Deputy Collector, Revenue Division, Koshi Project, Araria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the State :
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ application for the following relief :- "1. That, this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ (s) / direction (s) for commanding the respondents to promote the petitioner on class-III post from class-IV post and also for grant of all other consequential reliefs/benefits to the petitioner accordingly."
Patna High Court CWJC No.16015 of 2013(6) dt.09-09-2025 2/2
3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 18.8.2025 also when the Court passed the following order :- "No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the State is present.
3. This is an old matter of the year 2013 and the petitioner is not taking interest in pressing the writ application. By way of last indulgence, this case is being adjourned and if on the next date also no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, this Court may consider dismissing this case for non-prosecution.
4. Put up this case on 08.09.2025."
4. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner for the second consecutive day, the application is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U