← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16642/2015disposed

Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar Sharma And ANR. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-05-15Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16642 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2006 Thana- NAYA RAM NAGAR District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar Sharma son of Sri Ram Bilas Sharma 2.

Smt. Guria Devi, daughter of Sri Krishnandan Singh, wife of Sri Niranjan Kumar Both resident of village - Temuha, P.S.-Mansoor Chak, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Laxman Kumar son of Late Ram Bihari Chaudhary, resident of village - Ranuchak, P.S.-Nathnagar, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.

The learned counsel for the State is present. The petitioners have challenged the order 17.03.2015 passed by the learned 5th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Munger in Sessions Trial No. 688 of 2010, arising out of Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2006 whereby the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for discharge of the offences under Sections 326, 304(B), 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16642 of 2015(3) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been rejected.

On perusal of the order impugned and the materials brought forth in the petition, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order refusing to discharge. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to contest the trial and raise all such grounds urged in the present petition before the Trial Court. The Trial Court would be under an obligation to conclude the trial as early as possible.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- U T