Upendra Prasad Mandal @ Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35405 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2023 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Upendra Prasad Mandal @ Upendra Yadav Son of Late Kari Mandal R/O Vill.- Bara, P.S.- Bihra, Dist.- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Chandra Jha 3 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case and is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that the thrust of the allegation is that petitioner got appointed in the year 1980 as Chainman based on forged and fabricated certificate. It is further submitted that the services of the petitioner was earlier terminated along with other employees which was challenged before the learned Labour Court and the learned Labour Court decided the case in favour of the petitioner and other employees

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35405 of 2024(2) dt.13-05-2024 2/2 and thereafter, they were reinstated back in service. It is next submitted that the petitioner retired on 15-4-2020 and he came to be terminated from service by an order dated 16-4-2020. It is further submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that how a person who stands retired can be terminated. 4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 359 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T