← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23602/2012disposed

Nilam Devi @ Nilu Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-07-02Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23602 of 2012 ====================================================== Nilam Devi @ Nilu Devi, Wife Of Late Balmiki Prasad, Resident Of VillageGorapur, Post Office- Paigari, P.S. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Work Department, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Engineer-In-Chief Cum Additional Secretary, Rural Work Department, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Chief Engineer-2, Rural Work Department, Patna 5.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Work Division, 2, Jamui 6.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division- 2, Hilsa, Nalanda 7.

Sri Ram Briksha Kumar, Son Of Late Ranjit Kumar, Resident Of VillageGorapur, Post Office- Paigari, P.S. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Keshri, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-07-2024 Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that in terms of Clause (ii) of the appointment letter, petitioner, being the sister-in-law of the appointee/respondent no.7, who has been appointed as Clerk on compassionate basis on account of death of his father, she is entitled for share in the earning of brother-in-law and in this regard, petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation before respondent no.6, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division-

Patna High Court CWJC No.23602 of 2012(3) dt.02-07-2024 2/2 2, Hilsa, Nalanda for considering her grievance by passing a specific order, so that the amount, as admissible, can directly be transferred in the account of the petitioner by the respondents.

3. Considering the aforesaid specific submission made on behalf of petitioner, respondent no.6 is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of its filing by the petitioner, considering the fact that the writ petition has been pending before this Court since the year 2012.

4. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U