← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30105/2026bail granted

Madan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2025 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Madan Yadav S/o Late Mahabir Yadav Ro Vill. - Manikpur, P.s. - Pandarak, Dist. - Patna.

2.

Baby Devi @ Gaya Devi W/o Madan Yadav Ro Vill. - Manikpur, P.s. - Pandarak, Dist. - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case punishable for the offence under Sections 80(2) read with 3(5) of BNS.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant performed love marriage with co-accused Fuli @ Chandan Yadav in the year 2020 and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of informant's daughter by administering poison to her.

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30105 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2 is mother-in-law of the deceased. They are simply victim of over implications. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with deceased and her husband. It is further orally submitted that thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased who is already in custody . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM- 1st Barh, Patna in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T