Mohan Mahto @ Mohan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49779 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2018 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Mohan Mahto @ Mohan Kumar Son of late Devnarayan Mahto R/o Village Lalpur, P.S. Runni Saidpur, Distt. Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No.06 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363/366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant. . Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and she had developed love affairs with the petitioner and she herself left her house with her own sweet will, which is also reflected from her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49779 of 2018 (2) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No.06 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T