Kuldeep Kumar Yadav @ Kuldeep Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33359 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-542 Year-2025 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Kuldeep Kumar Yadav @ Kuldeep Yadav S/o- Late Anothi Yadav@ Late Anuthi Yadav R/v- Jagur Ward No- 12 PS- Triveniganj District-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Nitu Kumari, Advocate :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping a child aged about 18 months.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the son-in-law of the informant and the present case has been falsely instituted against him merely because there is a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and his wife, who happens to be the daughter of the informant. It is submitted that as a matter of fact, he had taken his brother-inlaw for treatment and it seems that under some confusion or for causing harassment to the petitioner the present case was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33359 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026 2/2 lodged. Learned counsel further submits that in any view of matter, the child had already been recovered and the petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.11.2025 with no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the basis of fact that the informant has supported the case of the prosecution under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering that the petitioner is the son-inlaw of the informant and the case seems to have arisen out of some matrimonial and domestic dispute in the family, let the above named petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Supaul/concerned Court below in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 542 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T