Lambu Kumar @ Satyendra Kumar @ Sagar Kumar @ Lambu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29582 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2019 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna ====================================================== LAMBU KUMAR @ SATYENDRA KUMAR @ SAGAR KUMAR @ LAMBU Son of Munni Lal Yadav Resident of Village- Paltu Bigha, P.S. Tharthari, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Pandey, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR of the occurrence of dacoity is against unknown. Name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Ajit Kumar, who has already been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court. The petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2020.

Submission is that the petitioner was never put on Test Identification Parade during investigation of the case nor any incriminating article was recovered from his possession. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29582 of 2020(3) dt.11-01-2021 2/2 petitioner is ready to cooperate the trial.

Considering the submission aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No.233 of 2019, with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T