← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6220/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Kali Chanran Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-03Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6220 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Kali Chanran Yadav and Ors S/o Late Manyar Gope 2.

Sidheshwaar Bharti S/o Late Etwari Puri both residents of Mahatma Gagan Diean, P.S. Lahari, P.O. Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda 3.

Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Sao S/o Gopi Sao Mohalla - Kamruddin Ganj, P.S. Lahari, P.O. Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner Cum Secretary Department of Revenue Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna 4.

Collector Cum District Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif 5.

Sub - Divisional officer, Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda 6.

Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bihar Sharif 7.

Anchal Adhikari, Bihar Sharif 8.

Officer in Charge P.S. Lahari Police Station P.O. Bihar Sharif, Nalanda ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Bhartee, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kr.Mandal SC-3 Mr. Bipin Kumar AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Respondent-State.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submits that in view of the statement made in para-12 of the counter affidavit filed by the Respondents No. 4 to 7 wherein it has been stated that an appeal vide Land Encroachment Appeal No. 02/2014 has been preferred by the petitioners before the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6220 of 2016(4) dt.03-07-2025 2/2 Respondents No.4 which is still pending for hearing and Title Suit No. 07/2014 has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners which is pending in the court of learned Sub-Judge- 1, Biharsharif, the petitioners do not wish to press the present writ application.

3. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ application is dismissed for non prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U