Surendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28642 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2018 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Surendra Yadav Son of Late Kamaldhari Yadav, Resident of Village - Gohri, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisharai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30013 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2018 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
BINOD YADAV Son of Sudhir Yadav, Resident of Village - Gohari, P.S.- Chanan, Distt - Lakhisarai.
2.
Ashok Yadav Son of Bhola Yadav, Resident of Village - Gohari, P.S.- Chanan, Distt - Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 28642 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yogesh Chandra Verma, Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bharat Bhushan Mr. Mrigendra Kumar Mr. Mayank (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30013 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar Mr. Mrigendra Kumar Mr. Mayank ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In these cases, the petitioners are seeking
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28642 of 2019(3) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 anticipatory bail in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 189 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation has been made that the accused persons called the father of informant for negotiating the dispute and in pursuance thereof, the father of informant had gone to Chotan Das Thakurbari where already the accused persons were armed with different weapons and later on they killed by pelting stones to the father of informant. The dispute arose on account of illegal mining of sand which the villagers were objecting. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and accordingly their prayer for bail is rejected. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T