Dhananjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29588 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== DHANANJAY YADAV SON OF SATYANARAYAN YADAV R/O- VILLMAYA BANDH, P.S.- BANDHWA KURWA, DIST.- BANKA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the petitioner with an intention to kill him assaulted him with knife on his private part causing injury and thereafter the informant was taken to a hospital.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner and informant are relatives and they are having land dispute as such the petitioner has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29588 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 falsely implicated when it is alleged that two other persons were also present along with the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that criminal cases cut both ways, if there was land dispute then chances are bright that the petitioner might have committed the occurrence, it is also submitted that the informant has specifically alleged against the petitioner that it was the petitioner who assaulted him with knife causing injury on his private part leading to hospitalization.

Considering the submission made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is thus rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T