Rabindra Nut @ Dholan Nut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25543 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== RABINDRA NUT @ DHOLAN NUT Son of Chatthu Nut @ Gulten Nut Resident of Village - Pathra, P.S. - Manghagarh, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-09-2020 As of now, the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing. The matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State .

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honor his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by office when called upon.

The petitioner seeks bail in Rasulpur P.S. Case no. 112

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25543 of 2020(2) dt.29-09-2020 2/3 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the I.P.C.

10 to 15 unknown persons are alleged to have committed dacoity. The allegation is that certain jewellery has been recovered from the petitioner's possession.

Petitioner's counsel submits that after his arrest in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case no. 114 of 2019 on 08.08.2019, he has been remanded in the present case on 07.12.2019. The petitioner till date has not been put on T.I.P. It is asserted that the silver jewellery, which has been recovered from the petitioner's possession, belongs to him and even that has not been put on identification in the trial. The learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM XI Saran Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25543 of 2020(2) dt.29-09-2020 3/3 inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U