← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31653/2023allowed

Shankar Modi @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31653 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== SHANKAR MODI @ ANIL KUMAR S/O GANAURI MODI R/O VillagePaura @ Paura Kadirganj, P.S- Kadirganj @ Kadirgan, Distt.- Nawada @ Nawadah.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raju Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution case, the accused persons said to have fired upon the informant's knee, right hand and right chest, due to which he sustained injury. It is further alleged that the petitioner and another co-accused fired, which hit one Niranjan Kumar.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. The allegation is not only against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31653 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 petitioner alone, but it is against two persons, so it can not be ascertained as who inflicted injury to said Niranjan Kumar out of two assailants. From the perusal of the injury report, it appears that only one lacerated wound found and the doctor opined that injury is simple in nature. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 14.12.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/ concerned Court in connection with Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 153 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T