Bhikhari Ram And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17684 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-726 Year-2010 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

Bhikhari Ram S/o Sri Rambachan Ram, resident of Village- Kamlpur, P.S. Kargahar, Dist- Rohtas.

2.

Durgesh Choudhary @ Yogesh Chaudhary, son of Nakchedi Choudhary resident of Village- Barhari, P.S.- Karghar, District- Rohtas. 3.

Satynarain Singh son of Late Sudarshan Singh resident of Village- Rehari, P.S.- Kargahar, Dist- Rohtas.

4.

Lakhan Yadav @ Sahjan Yadav son of Late Butan Singh Resident of Tekari, P.S. Kargahar, Dist- Rohtas.

5.

Jag Narayan Sah 6.

Ram Narayan Sah 7.

Lalji Sah 8.

Saheb Sah 9.

Radha Sah @ Radha Mohan Sah all 5 to 9 are sons of Late Deep Narayan Sah 10.

Dashrath Sah son of Late Mosafir Sah 11.

Dharmnath Sah son of Dashrath Sah 12.

Rajendra Sah son of Dashrath Sah 13.

Kisnandan Sah son of Sri Dashrath Sah 14.

Bhushan Sah son of Late Kedar Sah 15.

Uma Sah son of Shiv Kumar Sah 16.

Ramashankar Sah son of Late Uma Sah 17.

Birendra Sah son of Shiv Kumar Sah 18.

Ranjan Sah son of Late Bhushan Sah all 5 to 18 are resident of Barahari, P.S. Kargahar, Barhari O.P. Dist- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jeut Ram, S/o Late Moti Ram resident of Village- Barhari, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Mira Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-09-2023 Heard Mrs. Mira Kumari, learned counsel appearing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17684 of 2016(2) dt.20-09-2023 2/2 on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Khurshid Anwar, learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present quashing application.

3. Accordingly, the present quashing application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U