Kiran Begum @ Keeran Vegam @ Kiran Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30444 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- GWALPARA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Kiran Begum @ Keeran Vegam @ Kiran Khatun W/o- Feku Khan, Resident of Mohalla- Jot Jhanjhari, P.S.- Gwalpara, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Md. Islam Khan s/o Late Jiyarat Khan, R/o -Jot Manohar Jhanjhari P.S.- Gwalpara District- Madhepura.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Patla Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 instituted under Sections 406, 420, 120B, 323, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, complainant purchased 8 decimal of land in jointness with one Afroj Khan vide registered sale deed from one Chandra Kishore Yadav but due to some difficulty the complainant could not get possession over the said disputed land. It is alleged that the petitioner assured to the complainant that the land will be returned back. It is further alleged that a panchayati was made but petitioner refused to return the said land and sold it to one Amul Khatun and Rashida Khatoon vide registered sale deed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30444 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. She further submits that the complainant had filed this case only with a motive to harass the petitioner and other persons. Learned counsel submits that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature. She further submits that petitioner is a lady, having no criminal antecedent and she undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Udakishunganj in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No.70 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T