← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/2207/2017disposed

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Of Excise, Govt. Of Bihar At Patna And ORS

2018-04-26Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2207 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- JAMUI =========================================================== Santosh Kumar S/o Rami Saw resident of Chakai Bazar, P.S. Chakai District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary of Excise, Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Jamui.

3. The Superintendent of Excise District Jamui.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Jamui.

5. The S.H.O. Chakai.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner in the present case has prayed for desealing of the shop which is situated under Mauza Chakai Bazar, which has been sealed in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 98/2017 for the offence under Sections 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the purpose of de-sealing of the shop in question provisionally, petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court.

Considering the facts and circumstances, pending finalization of the confiscation proceeding, let the shop of the petitioner be de-sealed provisionally on production of document of

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2207 of 2017 dt.26-04-2018 title in respect of the shop in question on furnishing bank guarantee or original title deed of the property in question to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Jamui.

The District Magistrate, Jamui shall get prepared a photograph duly certified and a Panchnama of the shop in sealed condition before de-sealing of the same and the same will be kept on the record.

The petitioner undertakes not to challenge the said photograph and Panchanama in course of trial or the confiscation proceeding, as the case may be.

The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that she will not deal with the shop in question in favour of any third party or create any interest adverse to the interest of the State without permission of the authority concerned/Court and shall not allow any illegal act to be committed in the house in question. The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that if the shop in question is rented out he will get done prior police verification of the said person before handing over the possession of the shop. The application stands disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 28.04.2018 Transmission Date 28.04.2018