Patna High CourtCWJC/23444/2012disposed

Sunil Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23444 of 2012 ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE BISHWANATH SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DURMATTA, P.O. - DURMATTA, P.S. - HARPUR, SANGRAMPUR, DISTRICT - MUNGER ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER, DISTRICT - MUNGER

3. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER (ESTABLISHMENT), MUNGER, DISTRICT - MUNGER

4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TARAPUR, MUNGER, DISTRICT - MUNGER

5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUNGER, DISTRICT - MUNGER

6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, SANGRAMPUR, MUNGER, DISTRICT - MUNGER

7. VIJAY KUMAR MANDAL, MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUNGER

8. MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT DURMATTA, TARAPUR, DISTRICT - MUNGER

9. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT DURMATTA, TARAPUR, DISTRICT -MUNGER

10. SUDARSHAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DURMATTA, TARAPUR, DISTRICT - MUNGER ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate, For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar AC to AAG IX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed against the decision of District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Munger, contained an Annexure-12. He submits that now the State Appellate

Patna High Court CWJC No.23444 of 2012(3) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 Authority is available against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal as Appellate forum and as such petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, in case such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with copy of this order, the Appellate Authority will condone the delay in filing the appeal and entertain and decide expeditiously the same on its own merits in view of the pendency of the writ petition for last more than 5 1⁄2 years.

With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U