Lalan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.419 of 2021 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.448 of 2016 ====================================================== Lalan Prasad S/o- Shri Bahadur Prasad R/o At and P.O.- Bahrauli, Kunwar Tola, P.S. Masherak District- Saran.

... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, H.R.D. Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Deepak Anand, The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra. 5.

Mr. Awadhesh Bihari, The District Education Officer, Saran, Chapra. 6.

Mr. Ajit Kumar, The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Saran, Chapra.

7.

Mr. Hari Mohan Kumar, The B.D.O. Mashrakh, Saran. 8.

Mr. Magister Singh, The Block Education Extension Officer, Mashrakh, Saran.

9.

Mrs. Rita Devi, The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bahrauli, Block Mashrakh, District- Saran.

10.

Mr. Manager Prasad Singh, The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj, Bahrauli, Block- Mashrakh, District- Saran.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi (Aag10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 17-12-2024 Heard Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, learned AAG-10 for the Respondent-State.

2. Learned Advocate for the appellant under the

Patna High Court L.P.A No.419 of 2021(3) dt.17-12-2024 2/2 instruction seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal in view of the subsequent development which has taken place after filing of the appeal.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. The Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the appellant.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J) ( Dr. Anshuman, J) GKS/- U T