Anil Pandit @ Anil Kumar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51032 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2018 Thana -BEERPUR District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Anil Pandit @ Anil Kumar Pandit, Son of Rambilash Pandit @ Ramnivash Pandit, Resident of Village- Muzaffara, Ward No.8, Bhavanandpur, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 323, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that when police intercepted then petitioner and several other persons raised Hulla and tried to create obstacle and also attacked on police party. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner has been named in the F.I.R., but nothing specific has been attributed against the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51032 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Begusarai, in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T