Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30234 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2020 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== VIKRAM KUMAR Son of Bimal Sahni Resident of Village - Maida Babhangama, P.S.- Birpur, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2020 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act pending in the Court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to enmity of local party politics. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30234 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2021 2/2 petitioner is named in the first information report and the recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission advanced on behalf of the parties, this is not a fit case for bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T