Vidyanand Pandit @ Vijay Kumar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3124 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2020 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Vidyanand Pandit @ Vijay Kumar Pandit Son Of Late Mahendra Pandit Resident Of Village- Gaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. 2.

Sadanand Pandit Son Of Late Mahendra Pandit Resident Of VillageGaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. 3.

Mukesh Pandit @ Mukesh Kumar Son Of Anil Pandit Resident Of VillageGaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. 4.

Gautam Pandit @ Gautam Kumar Son Of Vidyanand Pandit @ Vijay Kumar Pandit Resident Of Village- Gaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. 5.

Sangat Pandit @ Sangam Kumar Son Of Vidyanand Pandit @ Vijay Kumar Pandit Resident Of Village- Gaiduha, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Rashmi Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-05-2022 Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

After some argument, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the appellants surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and pray

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3124 of 2021(2) dt.10-05-2022 2/2 for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day considering the fact that there is compromise between the parties.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T