Deepak Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30318 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2020 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Deepak Paswan Son Of Mutur Paswan Resident Of Village - Rajpur, P.S.- Kutumba, Dist.- Aurangabad.

2.

Raju Paswan Son Of Mutur Paswan Resident Of Village - Rajpur, P.S.- Kutumba, Dist.- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant and two other persons, causing they sustained injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He further submits that they are members of the minority community and encroached the public land belonging to the canal and further began to extend the Masjid, completely blocking the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30318 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 approach to the canal, which was opposed by the members of the other community, then they began to raise slogans, which resented to the youths of the village, as a result a minor scuffle took place between two groups, however, the matter was immediately brought under control by the elders of the village. The members of the Majority community also received injuries but they chose not to move ahead as that would further pollute the atmosphere. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Aurangabad in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 138 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T