← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31689/2023allowed

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31689 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2022 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST DistrictJehanabad ====================================================== RAVI RANJAN KUMAR son of Arjun Yadav Village- Mahadeo Bigha PsBarabar Paryatak Dist- Jehanabad Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the sister of the informant, due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31689 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 against the petitioner and others. The petitioner who is an employee of Jharkhand Police and at the relevant time he was on duty. He submitted that from the wedlock of the deceased gave birth of two children. During investigation, this fact came into light from vide paras- 44, 45, 53 and 54 of the case diary that the deceased herself committed suicide. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.03.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Barabar Tourist P.S. Case No. 200 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U