← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33592/2024allowed

Mayank Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33592 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Mayank Kumar son of Umesh Bhagat R/o Village- Belsand Saraiya Jhanda Chowk, P.S.- Belsand, dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.

3. Prosecution case relates to recovery of 500 grams of Charas like narcotics substance from the possession of the petitioner and 500 grams of Charas has also been recovered from the possession of other co-accused person namely Prabhu Bhagat.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33592 of 2024(2) dt.02-05-2024 2/3 offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has no concern with the seized incriminating material. The recovered Charas like substance from the possession of this petitioner does not come within the purview of commercial quantity as per NDPS Act. There is no independent witness of the seizure list rather the the witnesses are police personnel. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.04.2023. Moreover, similarly situated co-accused Prabhu Bhagat has been granted bail vide order dated 05.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58407 of 2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023 on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33592 of 2024(2) dt.02-05-2024 3/3 bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Sitamarhi.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T