← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52934/2018bail granted

Vinay Kumar Kashyap v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-09-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52934 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2014 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Kashyap, S/o Late Shivji Sharma, Resident of VillageKamta, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda and presently residing at C/o Sri Chandeshwar Prasad Singh, Tekari Road, Patthar Ki Masjid, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sandhya Devi, W/o Vinay Kumar Kashyap @ Santu, Resident of Village- Kamta, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda and presently residing at Village- Surujpur, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 494, 504, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52934 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Complaint Case No. 180(C) of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T