← Library
Patna High CourtSA/15/2013dismiss for nonprosecution

Reeta Devi v. Naresh Yadav And ORS.

2020-01-23Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SECOND APPEAL No.15 of 2013 ====================================================== Reeta Devi, wife of Suresh Kumar and daughter of Suresh Yadav, resident of Forest Colony, Dinkar Nagar, Post Office and Police Station-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

... ... (Defendant-Respondent)...Appellant.

Versus

1. Naresh Yadav, Son of Suresh Yadav.

2. Avinash.

3. Bhola.

4. Nitish. Nos. 2 to 4 all minor sons of Naresh Yadav under the guardianship of their father, namely, Naresh Yadav. Nos. 1 to 4 all residents of Mohalla- Khandakpar, Town and Police Station-Biharsharif, District- Nalanda. ... ... (Plaintiffs-Appellants).....Respondents 1st Set.

5. Suresh Yadav, Son of Late Laxman Gope.

6. Sahodari Devi, wife of Suresh Yadav.

7. Umesh Yadav, Son of Suresh Yadav.

8. Rozi Kumari.

9. Payal Kumari. Nos. 8 to 9 both minor daughters of Umesh Kumar under the guardianship of their father, namely, Umesh Yadav. Nos. 5 to 9 all residents of Moalla-Khandakpar, Town-Biharsharif, Post Office and Police Station-Biharsharif, District-Nalanda.

... ....(Defendants-Respondents)...Respondents 2nd Set. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

None.

For the Respondents :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 As per office notes dated 10.09.2018, notices issued to respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7 to 9 is declared to be validly served on their refusal. It has been further pointed out by the office that as per report of the process server, the respondents refused to accept notices stating that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties.

On earlier occasion, none had appeared on behalf of

Patna High Court SA No.15 of 2013(6) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 the appellant. Today also, none appears on behalf of the appellant.

Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U