Mohan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33182 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Mohan Prasad Son Of Jaleshwar Prasad Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, Ps- Gopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar 2.
Santosh Prasad Son Of Baliram Prasad Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, Ps- Gopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar 3.
Sanjay Prasad Son Of Baliram Prasad Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, PsGopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar 4.
Shatrughan Prasad @ Shatrudhan Prasad Son Of Late Devnarayan Prasad Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, Ps- Gopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar 5.
Umashankar Prasad @ Uma Prasad Son Of Moti Prasad Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, Ps- Gopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.
Ram Sagar Choubey Son Of Late Ram Prasann Choubey Resident Of Village- Mukeri Tola, Ps- Gopalganj Town, Distt- Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prashant Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present application filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing and setting aside the order dated 27.03.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 378/2022 arising out of Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 546 of 2019 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court was pleased to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33182 of 2023(2) dt.28-10-2024 2/2 allow the application dated 08.02.2023 filed by the prosecution and ordered for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioners.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T