← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31079/2020disposed

Tanmay Kumar Mukharjee @ Tanmay Mukharjee v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-10Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31079 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saharsa ====================================================== TANMAY KUMAR MUKHARJEE @ TANMAY MUKHARJEE Son of Late Tarun Kumar Mukharjee Resident of Village and P.S. - Bihpur, District - Bhagalpur at present working to the post of clerk in Koshi Command area development agency, Department of water Resources, Saharsa and residing near Koshi Chauk, P.S. and District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Smt. Nisha Mukharjee Wife of Tanmay Kumar Mukharjee @ Tanmay Mukharjee, Daughter of Late Varun Bhatacharya Resident of Village - Kabir Chauk, P.S. and District - Saharsa at present residing at Kayasth Tola, P.S. and District - Saharsa.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh- Advocate For the State :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-08-2021 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, the learned Advocate for the opposite party no.2 and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila (Saharsa) P. S. Case No.03 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 313, 504, 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31079 of 2020(4) dt.10-08-2021 2/3 At the outset, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that he is not averse to the talks of settlement with his wife/ opposite party no.2, provided she is agreeable for the same. He also wants a rapprochement and perhaps restitution of conjugal rights.

Considering the aforesaid stand of the petitioner, this Court directs that if he surrenders before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, he shall be released on provisional bail. While granting provisional bail to the petitioner, his wife (opposite party no.2) shall be noticed and on her appearance, the Court below shall explore the possibilities of settlement between the spouses. In case, the settlement is arrived at, the Court below shall fix the modality of the return of wife/ opposite party no.2 to her matrimonial home.

The provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed only on settlement of dispute between the parties or in the event of the wife/ opposite party no.2 deliberately choosing not to settle the dispute without any appropriate cause.

If the conduct of the petitioner is found to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31079 of 2020(4) dt.10-08-2021 3/3 genuine, his provisional bail shall be confirmed by the Court below.

With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the application stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) vikash/- U T