Vicky Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30717 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-509 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

VICKY KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR S/o Dharmendra Vishwakarma Resident of Village- kewali, P.S. - Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad, At present - In the house of Lalkesh Yadav, Prakhand Colony, P.S.- Ghoshi, DistrictJehanabad. 2.

Vikash Kumar S/o Ganauri Vishwakarma Residen of Village- Gopalganj Bazar, P.s.- Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad.

3.

Sonu Kumar S/o Bal Govind Yadav Resident of Village- Dhautal Bigha, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioners alongwith other accused persons kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30717 of 2022(3) dt.09-11-2022 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C in which she has supported the prosecution case.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is rejected.

This instant application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T