Wasim Akram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30533 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== WASIM AKRAM Son of Md. Ishak Khan Resident of Village- Rampur Bairath P.S.- Kachwa, Dist- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, Addl Public Prosecutor Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner who is husband of opposite party no. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341,323,379,498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 2500/-per month, starting from this month, to the informant Samrin Ishrat. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 2500/- per month, provisional bail dated 14.5.2019 is hereby confirmed on the following conditions:-

(1) Informant Samrin Ishrat would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30533 of 2019(7) dt.02-03-2020 2/2

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(6) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T