Chandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30048 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2026 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Chandan Prasad S/o- Indal Prasad @ Inal R/v- Shukl Bhathai Ps-Chaura Khas Dist- Kushinagar UP ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Baijnath Sah For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 127 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case is that 204 liters of country made foreign liquor was recovered from the E-Rickshaw.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2026 and has got clean criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30048 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of I/C D.A.J. xiii cum Special Judge Excise-1 Gopalganj/concerned Court in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 127 of 2026.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.
(Ansul, J) abhishekkr/- U T