← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35440/2024bail granted

Md. Sajid Ekwal @ Md. Nawab Sajid Iqbal @ Nawab Sajid Iqbal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-31Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35440 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-445 Year-2023 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Md. Sajid Ekwal @ Md. Nawab Sajid Iqbal @ Nawab Sajid Iqbal son of Late Md. Sajid Alam @ Md. Sajjad Ahmad, R/o Village- Chiktoli, Ward No.-33, PS + Dist- Ara (Bhojpur).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kurtha PS Case No. 445 of 2023, FIR dated 06.12.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 116 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

According to the prosecution case, a viral video was circulated, wherein transaction of money was made by the petitioner to one Bahan Sweta, and the viral video was inspected by the informant and Revenue Officer-cum-kanungo. It is further alleged that Bahan Sweta has admitted that the petitioner through whatsapp message has demanded money from Raiyat Chitranjan Prasad for Raiyati karana of Bakasta land. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35440 of 2024(4) dt.31-07-2024 2/3 that this act of Government servant is illegal. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the present FIR has been instituted on the basis of a viral video and no one has come forward to lodge a complaint or FIR against the petitioner and without forensic examination of the video, the present FIR has been instituted.

5.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and mainly the facts that petitioner has clean antecedent and the present FIR has been instituted on the basis of a viral video that has not been forensically examined, let the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, where the case is pending in connection with Kurtha PS Case No. 445 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35440 of 2024(4) dt.31-07-2024 3/3 conditions:

(i). Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the learned trial Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the learned trial Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the learned trial Court.

(ii). If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iii). And further condition that the learned trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the learned trial Court shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T