← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32132/2025bail granted

Md. Juman @ Md. Aarif v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32132 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2022 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Md. Juman @ Md. Aarif S/o Md., Nasim Firdosi R/o Maula Nagar, Talab Par, P.S.- Manikpujr, District- Lakhisarai, Pin Code- 811106 2.

Md. Kalim S/o Md. Farman R/o Abgil Rampur, P.S.- Mednichowk, DistrictLakhisarai, Pin Code- 811106 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aryan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 448, 380, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against petitioners is that they alongwith other F.I.R. named co-accused assaulted the informant and his family members by means of iron rod, lathi while the informant was digging hole on the earth for marriage ceremony. It is further alleged that the accused persons also took away jewellery and cash of Rs. 50,000/- from the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32132 of 2025(2) dt.21-07-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to petty dispute, a simple occurrence of maar-peet took place between the parties, in which, both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, are simple in nature and rest of the allegations are ornamental. Moreover, F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 7 days without there being any plausible explanation of delay. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the simple nature of injuries and delay in lodging the F.I.R., let the petitioners, as named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Lakhisarai / concerned Court in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P. S. Case No. 158 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T