Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52130 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2017 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav S/o Ram Kumar Yadav @ Ram Kumar Prasad, R/o Vill.- Ganeshi Bigha, P.S.- Kako at present Resides at Mohalla- Kali Nagar, Court Area P.S. & District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 38(1), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 71.250 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the disclosure of co-accused Depu Yadav and Ramlal Sharma. Except for this, there is no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52130 of 2018(2) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 71.250 liters wine is recovered from the tempo. The tempo in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. case No.59 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T