Golu Kumar @ Amrender Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33311 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Amrender Singh S/o Brij Bihari Singh, R/o Village- Sarma, P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nabin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 dated 20.02.2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 317(2), 111(2)(b) and 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per prosecution story, 70.05 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the white coloured Maruti Suzuki Dzire car near Islampur-Murgaon road.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to local politics. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner has no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33311 of 2025(2) dt.26-05-2025 2/3 concern with the alleged recovery. There was non-compliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr.P.C. / Section 103 of BNSS, 2023. Petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025. He further submits that after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as petitioner's period under custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed as yet. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, on further conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every fixed date and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33311 of 2025(2) dt.26-05-2025 3/3 may be cancelled by the learned trial Court.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there may be delay in framing of charge, in this circumstance, after adopting due procedure, case record of the petitioner may be separated and charge may be framed.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T