Md. Teebha @ Teebha @ Teeva @ Jahangir @ Md. Jahangir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42114 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-679 Year-2018 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Md. Teebha @ Teebha @ Teeva @ Jahangir @ Md. Jahangir S/O Bhakhani Makhbool @ Md. Makbool R/O Masjid Chowk, Near Nakhas Road, Marvari Mandir, P.S-Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Mustaque Alam Mr. Hemant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 451, 427, 436, 379, 352, 354, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. There is case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42114 of 2021(3) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 and counter case between the parties. He submits that the similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.02.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40665 of 2021. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that though occurrence took place in the year 2018 but petitioner moved before this Court in the year 2021. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 679 of 2018. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T