Sangeeta Kuwar @ Sangita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30243 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-821 Year-2025 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sangeeta Kuwar @ Sangita Devi S/o- Late Jitendra Ray Resident of Baruna P.S- Bikramganj, Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 821 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, coaccused persons fired upon the husband of the informant and shot him dead. The allegation against the petitioner is that she came to the spot where the dead body was lying and said that the enemy has died.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. From the FIR it is clear that it is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30243 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/3 case of completely false implication. The prosecution story is not believable. There is no allegation of any specific overt act of assault against the petitioner who is the mother of coaccused Ankit Rai and Neeraj Rai and for this reason she has been made accused in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent and she is in custody since 08.12.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the vague and doubtful nature of allegation against the petitioner and also considering submission of charge sheet and period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Sasaram at Rohtas/concerned court, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 821 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30243 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 3/3 (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anuradha/- U T